Skip to main content

Leadership in Times of Transformational Change

While my reading list continues to outgrow my ability to get them all read, I continue to find myself drawn back to Russell Ackoff. Yes, I know - I'm a social systems junkie. However, we are working on and in social systems and so I return to social systems design to better understand how to lead and influence the education system - my area of passion.

I think a lot about leadership and what it means in an age of transformation -when it is no longer about reforming or improving our systems but changing their very essence. Perhaps it was this bias in my thinking that caused one of Ackoff's quotes to jump off the page: "Inspiration without implementation is provocation, not leadership. Implementation without inspiration is management or administration, not leadership. Therefore, leaders must be both creative, in order to inspire, and courageous, in order to induce implementation." (A Systemic View of Transformational Leadership).

Inspiration: rather than persuade, demand, or get "buy-in" (tools of mechanistic and biological system paradigms), transformational leaders must inspire - move people to make sacrifices in pursuit of a preferred future. Here is why it is critical that new leaders understand the theory and methodology of social systems - Inspiring visions are creative acts of design and to be a designer of a social system one must understand its principles and dimensions as well as the principles and dimensions of the systems we have inherited.

Implementation: If you can inspire people to move towards a preferred future but can't or won't aggressively take action, then you simply create more cynics (passionate people who don't want to be disappointed again). Ackoff uses the word "courageous" - I like this word and think it means - be bold, take well-thought out risks, push people out of their comfort zones, be willing to stand with them as they take bold and audacious actions, and allow them to make mistakes for it is the only way we learn.

So - you want to be a leader in an Age of Transformation? Ackoff asks two important questions:  1. If you do not know what you would do if you could do whatever you wanted, without constraint, how can you possibly know what to do when there are?  2. If you do not know what you want right now how can you possibly know what you will want in the future?

Do you have an idealized design - a future you would have today if you could? Is it based upon the principles and dimensions of a social system?

As Ackoff says, "Transformational leaders are driven by ideas, not by the expectations of others." Education cannot afford any other type of leadership today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Faces of Change

Watching the annual legislative session and the political posturing by the groups and people in power I'm constantly struck by something my doc chair said to me almost a decade ago now. "Trace, we are in an ideological war that's just as contentious as the one that birthed Newtonian science and the mechanical age. Make no mistake, the current Newtonian view of the world will not go down without a fight." He couldn't have been more right. A constant struggle for me is finding ways to assist people in bridging the gap between the old way of organizing and changing the world and the new. I find almost everyone I meet cognitively recognizes that things are different. They can use the words correctly but many struggle to recognize the implicit and cultural patterns they continue to apply to the problems we face. The beauty in all of this is that almost all are incredibly passionate and bright. It took me a decade after I was first exposed to this way of thinking a...

Following the "Research" in watershed times, is like driving using the rear-view mirror.

First off - don't jump to the conclusion that I reject research altogether. Don't get me wrong - I find value in research. The issue for me is a simple one: research is contextual. Research is also conducted, by necessity, within the existing framework - the functions, structures and processes - of the current educational paradigm. We are at a point in history where I believe it absolutely critical and necessary to create and implement a new educational design. The simple fact is that you cannot continuously improve into something new - something new requires design or re-design. Research is about finding ways to improve within the current constraints and frameworks - great when you are actively trying to improve what you have. But what happens when we have a model we don't want anymore? Research, even emanating from the old paradigms, can be instructive. Let's just be careful that we don't simply "follow the research." The game is new, it is uncharted, an...

Bill Spady and OBE - a brief personal history for my young educational friends

From 1992 to 1994 I was fortunate enough to get to know and work with Dr. William G. Spady - the founder and father of Outcome-Based Education, or OBE. All of us working now to implement competency-based learning systems, dynamic teaching and learning, authentic assessment, and contextualized learning in a multitude of dimensions owe a great deal to Bill Spady. If you've never heard of Bill or OBE - you might want to read this little history lesson. In 1992 my friend and mentor,Al Rowe, connected me with his friend, Bill Spady. For those of us in education and paying any attention in the early 90's we all know him to be the father of OBE - Outcome-Based Education. He was right then, he's right now and we owe a lot to our current transformational efforts to him. Bill allowed me to participate in his workshops across the country and to hone my consulting and presentation skills as a very young educator. He was an intense and unrelenting intellectual power combined with passio...