Skip to main content

From "Consumer-Oriented" to "Producer-Oriented" Learning (and schools)

I'm excited about the future of education. The problems we face as a nation, state, and community are seemingly intractable and the decisions made by Newtonian government structures and processes seem to make things worse. Despite all of this, I believe in the American people and the leaders - education, community and business - who understand we must transform education to remain viable.

As I continually search out easier, simpler, more direct ways of expressing what is meant by "tranforming schools" I've come across the concept of "producer-oriented" schooling and learning. I can't say exactly from where it came, although I know I am certainly not the originator. Perhaps it was in my renewed conversations with my mentor and friend, Al Rowe or perhaps it was a collection of ideas from multiple conversations and readings. As Steven Johnson says, "an idea is not a single thing. It is more like a swarm." Where Good Ideas Come From. The Natural History of Innovation (p. 46).

Our schools - most of them anyway and in particular the "comprehensive high school" would best be termed "consumer-oriented" in that it treats learning as a consumable good and children as consumers. Students, usually without the ability to "purchase" what they want, are fed information and knowledge through courses, classes, curriculum, and teachers. The general idea is to provide them with these inputs (goods) and have them spit back what they know, thus validating them as learned. This cycle repeats itselt multiple times a day, 180 days a year for 13 years. It reduces children to passive receivers who are valued for their compliance and "good attitudes." Being successful in a consumer-oriented school doesn't require a student really understand the complexities and "wicked problems" that truly exists in a world where discipline knowledge isn't so neatly and conveniently compartmentalized.

Schools today must become "producer-oriented" organizations where students are asked to create, innovate, and produce things of value beyond just a course grade or to satisfy one teacher. Students enter our schools as creators, innovators and producers so enhancing and building on that natural desire must be entirely possible and plausible. Our schools must make it impossible for a student to pass through it without having the ability to understand the complexities and interconnectedness of the disciplines and that there are ways to deal with "wicked" and seemingly intractable problems. When students engage their passions and interests and connect with adult professionals who can mentor and facilitate their learning to create things that have value beyond the classroom or assignment, we are ensuring America's future success.

How long must we continue to tweak and cajole small scale improvements in our consumer-oriented systems before we get busy doing what we must do - transform schools to producer-oriented organizations?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Two Faces of Change

Watching the annual legislative session and the political posturing by the groups and people in power I'm constantly struck by something my doc chair said to me almost a decade ago now. "Trace, we are in an ideological war that's just as contentious as the one that birthed Newtonian science and the mechanical age. Make no mistake, the current Newtonian view of the world will not go down without a fight." He couldn't have been more right. A constant struggle for me is finding ways to assist people in bridging the gap between the old way of organizing and changing the world and the new. I find almost everyone I meet cognitively recognizes that things are different. They can use the words correctly but many struggle to recognize the implicit and cultural patterns they continue to apply to the problems we face. The beauty in all of this is that almost all are incredibly passionate and bright. It took me a decade after I was first exposed to this way of thinking a

Reflection, fear, and the status quo

It's been awhile since I've blogged. Turns out being Associate Superintendent of Iowa's 2nd largest school district is a bit time consuming. I'm loving my new job and the opportunities the district and community are giving me to transform education. I'm busy helping our community and district have deeper conversations about learning and what "school" needs to look like and be. As I hit my 100th day mark in this new job, I'm taking a bit of time to reflect on some of the things I've been thinking about and been presented with as of late. First, and this is somewhat of a 'derp' comment, it has become rather obvious to me that the professionals able to survive and thrive in these exciting and turbulent times have one gift or skill separating them from the pack. They are highly reflective - about their practice, about the system they're in, about their contributions to the problems and solutions, and about themselves as learners and hum

Bill Spady and OBE - a brief personal history for my young educational friends

From 1992 to 1994 I was fortunate enough to get to know and work with Dr. William G. Spady - the founder and father of Outcome-Based Education, or OBE. All of us working now to implement competency-based learning systems, dynamic teaching and learning, authentic assessment, and contextualized learning in a multitude of dimensions owe a great deal to Bill Spady. If you've never heard of Bill or OBE - you might want to read this little history lesson. In 1992 my friend and mentor,Al Rowe, connected me with his friend, Bill Spady. For those of us in education and paying any attention in the early 90's we all know him to be the father of OBE - Outcome-Based Education. He was right then, he's right now and we owe a lot to our current transformational efforts to him. Bill allowed me to participate in his workshops across the country and to hone my consulting and presentation skills as a very young educator. He was an intense and unrelenting intellectual power combined with passio